> > I have been studying DeadLockCheck for most of a day now,
> > and I doubt that this is the only bug lurking in it.
> > I think that we really ought to throw it away and start
> > over, because it doesn't look to me at all like a standard
> > deadlock-detection algorithm. The standard way of doing
>
> Go ahead. Throw away my code. *sniff* :-)
And my changes from the days of 6.5 -:)
Vadim