RE: Status of new relation file naming
От | Mikheev, Vadim |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Status of new relation file naming |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018CC5@SECTORBASE1 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Status of new relation file naming ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>) |
Ответы |
RE: Status of new relation file naming
RE: Status of new relation file naming |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Rename... Why would we need in rename with OID filenames? > > Andreas seems to refer to in place replacement of OID files e.g. > using your *relink*. Sorry, I've messed things for myself. Ok. In short, I vote for UNIQUE_ID (unrelated to pg_class.oid) file names. I think that it's better to implement this (but neither OID nor OID.VERSION) right now because of this is like what we'll have in new smgr - tablespace_id.relation_file_node. Pg_class' OID is kind of logical things, totaly unrelated to the issue how/where to store relation file. Please comment ASAP. Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: