RE: Big 7.1 open items
От | Mikheev, Vadim |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C39@SECTORBASE1 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Big 7.1 open items (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Big 7.1 open items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > The symlinks wouldn't do any good for what Bruce had in > > > mind anyway (IIRC, he wanted to get useful per-database > > > numbers from "du"). > > > > Our database design seems to be in the opposite direction > > if it is restricted for the convenience of command calls. > > Well, I don't see any reason not to use tablespace/database > rather than just tablespace. Seems having fewer files in each directory Once again - ability to use different tablespaces (disks) for tables/indices in the same schema. Schemas must not dictate where to store objects <- bad design. > will be a little faster, and if we can make administration easier, > why not? Because you'll not be able use du/ls once we'll implement new smgr anyway. And, btw, - for what are we going implement tablespaces? Just to have fewer files in each dir ?! Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: