RE: Big 7.1 open items
От | Mikheev, Vadim |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C2B@SECTORBASE1 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Big 7.1 open items (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
RE: Big 7.1 open items
Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> If we bit the bullet and restricted ourselves to numeric filenames then > the log would need just four numeric values: > database OID > tablespace OID Is someone going to implement it for 7.1? > relation OID > relation version number I believe that we can avoid versions using WAL... > (this set of 4 values would also be an smgr file reference token). > 16 bytes/log entry looks much better than 64. > > At the moment I can recall the following opinions: > > Pure OID filenames: Thomas, Tom, Marc, Peter E. + me. But what about LOCATIONs? I object using environment and think that locations must be stored in pg_control..? Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: