Heya,
I tested against the original version, CVS 1.71.2.1, and it applied
fine.
------------------------------------
[nkd@WEBBASED postgresql]$ patch -p0 describe.c <
describe_inherits_733.diff
patching file describe.c
[nkd@WEBBASED postgresql]$
------------------------------------
Anyway, I have also put together a 7.4 patch, which is attached, CVS
1.77. I have tested applying this patch and it also works fine.
Hope that's clearer.
Kind Regards,
Nick Barr
WebBased Ltd.
Tel: (01752) 764445
Fax: (01752) 764446
Email: nick.barr@webbased.co.uk
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You
should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute
its contents to any other person.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teodor Sigaev [mailto:teodor@sigaev.ru]
> Sent: 26 June 2003 18:42
> To: Nick Barr
> Cc: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org; pgsql-general
> Subject: Re: Inherits tables and current CVS
>
>
>
> Nick Barr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Having read the list, and noticed the message about table
inheritance I
> > thought that I would see if I could come up with a simple solution,
and
> > have my first delve into the code for PostgreSQL.
> >
> > Attached is a diff against 7.3.3 source, of changes to describe.c
for
> > psql. This should print out a list of parent tables in a similar
style
> > to that of the index listing. I have done some testing on my side
and it
> > all seems fine, can some other people have a quick look? What do
people
> > think? Useful?
> Cool!! Thank you. But your patch can't be applyed to current CVS:
>
> % patch < ~/describe_inherits.diff
> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |--- describe.c Sat Dec 21 01:07:22 2002
> |+++ describe_inherits.c Thu Jun 26 18:05:17 2003
> --------------------------
> Patching file describe.c using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 928 (offset -13 lines).
> Hunk #2 failed at 1021.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1159 with fuzz 1 (offset 7 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1162 (offset -13 lines).
> 1 out of 4 hunks failed--saving rejects to describe.c.rej
>
>
>
> --
> Teodor Sigaev E-mail:
teodor@sigaev.ru