RE: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics
| От | Yotsunaga, Naoki |
|---|---|
| Тема | RE: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8E9126CB6CE2CD42962059AB0FBF7B0DC9B9F6@g01jpexmbkw23 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 8:42 PM, Robert Hass wrote: Thanks for comments. >or at least not nearly as useful the results of a sampling approach. I agree with your opinion. Because it can't be asserted that the wait event is a bottleneck just because the number of wait event is large. The same thing is mentioned in Oracle. It also suggests that it is important to acquire waiting time for that. ---- https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/18/tgdba/measuring-database-performance.html#GUID-811E9E65-C64A-4028-A90E-102BBFF6E68F 5.2.3 Using Wait Events without Timed Statistics ---- >The data that LWLOCK_STATS produce are downright misleading Is that so? I do not know the need for this function. --- Naoki Yotsunaga
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: