Re: stats_block_level

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: stats_block_level
Дата
Msg-id 8B66357B-A288-40CE-9717-AFA35B92C161@decibel.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: stats_block_level  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: stats_block_level
Список pgsql-hackers
On Jul 26, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> So maybe the *real* question to ask is why we have separate GUCs for
> stats_row_level and stats_block_level.  Shouldn't we fold them into a
> single switch?  It's hard to see what having just one of them  
> turned on
> will save.

IIRC, the guys at Emma have seen a performance difference with  
stats_block_level off and row_level on, presumable due in part to  
having 150k tables.

Erik? Kim?
--
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Machine available for community use
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Quick idea for reducing VACUUM contention