Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle
От | Bernd Helmle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8ABB9E5EE84D22C2C4B6585B@amenophis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules
Bernd Helmle
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
--On 23. Januar 2009 13:28:27 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > In short, I don't feel that this was ready to be applied. It's probably > fixable with a week or so's work, but do we want to be expending that > kind of effort on it at this stage of the release cycle? > Uh well, i'd be happier if such review comments would have been made earlier in the CommitFest. If i understand you correctly we have the choice between a) revert this patch, fix all remaining issues which will likely postpone this for 8.5 b) don't revert, but try to fix the issues currently existing in HEAD. It seems you're unsure wether b) is an option at all, because the amount of remaining work exceeds the time left for this release cycle? To be honest: I'm disappointed. If it tooks only a few steps to identify those (obviously important) issues, i get the opinion that there's very few motivating interest in this functionality (And yes, i'm annoyed about myself to not consider those operator issues). Bernd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: