I was aware of the other one and, in fact, reverted the change just to make sure it wasn’t Involved. A strange
coincidenceindeed.
On 8/31/17, 3:57 PM, "Peter Geoghegan" <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
Hi Dan, Nice to hear from you. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Wood, Dan <hexpert@amazon.com> wrote: >
Becausetupgone is false we freeze instead of deleting. Freezing a DEAD > tuple makes it visible. Here is a comment
inheap_prepare_freeze_tuple() > > > > * It is assumed that the caller has checked the tuple with > > *
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum()and determined that it is not HEAPTUPLE_DEAD Funny that there'd be another bug
associatedwith heap_prepare_freeze_tuple() so soon after the last one was discovered. Are you aware of the other
one[1]? BTW, I just posted a patch to enhance amcheck, to allow it to verify that an index has all the entries
thatit ought to [2]. Perhaps you'd find it useful for this kind of thing. I welcome your feedback on that. [1]
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=31b8db8e6c1fa4436116f4be5ca789f3a01b9ebf;hp=f1dae097f2945ffcb59a9f236843e0e0bbf0920d
[2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/14/1263/ -- Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs