Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom, are you planning to take this one?
Yeah, I already looked at it once, so will take it.
I think the main remaining issue is that we don't have consensus on
the function name AFAICT. I'm okay with using width_bucket(), as
is done in the latest patch, but there were objections ...
regards, tom lane