Thanks for the updated patch and the fixes!
On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 08:37 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_restore.sgml
> > > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_restore.sgml
> >
> > > + <varlistentry>
> > > + <term><option>-A <replaceable class="parameter">schema_variable</replaceable></option></term>
> > > + <term><option>--variable=<replaceable class="parameter">schema_variable</replaceable></option></term>
> > > + <listitem>
> > > + <para>
> > > + Restore a named schema variable only. Multiple schema variables may be specified with
> > > + multiple <option>-A</option> switches.
> > > + </para>
> > > + </listitem>
> > > + </varlistentry>
> >
> > Do we need that? We have no such option for functions and other non-relations.
>
> It is designed to be consistent with others. pg_restore supports functions -P, triggers -T
> >
> > And if we really want such an option for "pg_restore", why not for "pg_dump"?
> >
>
> I have no strong opinion about it, I think so it is consistent with other non-relations, but it is not important.
>
> I moved this feature to a separate patch. It can be committed optionaly or later.
>
> pg_restore has options -P, -T, and pg_dump does not have these options. These options (functionality) can
> be implemented in pg_dump too, but unfortunately -T is used for different purposes (exclude table).
Ah! I didn't realize that -P and -T are the same. So no objections, although I'm
not sure if anyone will ever want to restore a single variable from a backup.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe