Re: Question on indexes
От | Erik Wienhold |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question on indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 88e5c335-c70e-4973-9b71-6c12e251e5b7@ewie.name обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Question on indexes (sud <suds1434@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question on indexes
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 2024-10-10 20:49 +0200, sud wrote: > However, we are seeing that one of the databases has multiple hash indexes > created. So I wanted to understand from experts here, if it's advisable in > any specific scenarios over B-tre despite such downsides? Two things come to my mind: 1. Btree puts a limit on the size of indexed values, whereas hash indexes only store the 32-bit hash code. 2. Of the core index types, only btree supports unique indexes. Example of btree's size limit: CREATE TABLE b (s text); CREATE INDEX ON b USING btree (s); INSERT INTO b (s) VALUES (repeat('x', 1000000)); ERROR: index row requires 11464 bytes, maximum size is 8191 The docs have more details: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/btree.html https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/hash-index.html -- Erik
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: