Re: Postgres (selection of thesis topic)
От | Alexander Staubo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres (selection of thesis topic) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 88daf38c0705020600t2a9562eauc669ae5e75be160b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres (selection of thesis topic) ("Harpreet Dhaliwal" <harpreet.dhaliwal01@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres (selection of thesis topic)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 5/2/07, Harpreet Dhaliwal <harpreet.dhaliwal01@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm kind of new to postgresql and the project that I'm working on currently > deals with parsing emails, storing parsed components in postgresql DB and > fire triggers > on certain inserts that opens socket connection with a unix tools server, Are you sure it is a good idea to do this processing synchronously? What happens if there is a network problem? It sounds like an inefficient and inflexible design. > I have done alot of homework on this and could think of something like "bulk > of data storage in email parsing and how vacuuming it would increase the > performance" because i think this vacuum DB concept is not there in other > RDBMS. SQLite also requires vacuuming, as does other databases based on MVCC-like designs, although some (eg., Oracle with its redo logs, iirc) do their housekeeping behind the scenes. Alexander.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: