On 20/06/18 16:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 01:32:58PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> Just a minor nit in the last sentence:
>>
>> "have to be from" -> "must be from / must belong to"
> I think that both have the same meaning, but I am no native speaker so I
> may be missing a nuance of some kind.
> --
> Michael
I am a native English speaker, and I was born in England.
In this context, "have to be from", "must be from", and "must belong to"
are all logically equivalent. I have a very slight preference for "must
be from".
Cheers,
Gavin