Re: Missing [NO] INDENT flag in XMLSerialize backward parsing
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing [NO] INDENT flag in XMLSerialize backward parsing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 88b183f1-ebf9-4f51-9144-3704380ccae7@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Missing [NO] INDENT flag in XMLSerialize backward parsing (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missing [NO] INDENT flag in XMLSerialize backward parsing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-02-21 Fr 1:31 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:27:42PM +0100, Jim Jones wrote: >> This patch adds the missing [NO] INDENT flag to XMLSerialize backward >> parsing. > if (xexpr->op == IS_XMLSERIALIZE) > + { > appendStringInfo(buf, " AS %s", > format_type_with_typemod(xexpr->type, > xexpr->typmod)); > + if (xexpr->indent) > + appendStringInfoString(buf, " INDENT"); > + else > + appendStringInfoString(buf, " NO INDENT"); > + } > > Good catch, we are forgetting this option in ruleutils.c. Will fix > down to v16 where this option has been introduced as you are > proposing, with NO INDENT showing up in the default case. The three > expected outputs look OK as written.. The fix has broken cross version upgrade test. Maybe we need to filter out NO INDENT in releases prior to 16 in AdjustUpgrade.pm? cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: