Re: [HACKERS] RFC: ALTER SYSTEM [...] COMMENT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] RFC: ALTER SYSTEM [...] COMMENT
Дата
Msg-id 8899.1493227902@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] RFC: ALTER SYSTEM [...] COMMENT  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] RFC: ALTER SYSTEM [...] COMMENT
Список pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I wouldn't fight hard to change it but really if we think about it, what 
> makes more sense from usability perspective?

> CREATE TABLE foo() COMMENT IS

I think it's likely to be impossible to shoehorn such a thing into every
type of CREATE command without making COMMENT a fully reserved word,
which is going to be a very hard sell.

> 2. Make it so comments are appended not replaced.

Backwards compatibility fail ... not to mention that you haven't offered
an argument as to why everyone would think this is an improvement.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] StandbyRecoverPreparedTransactions recovers subtrans links incorrectly
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort