Unless it has changed, my only real gripe is the lack of batch insert capabilities. We have to do some ugly things
sincewe cannot get IDs returned from batch inserts.
-Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Dave Cramer
Sent: Fri 3/25/2011 6:30 AM
To: Simon Riggs
Cc: List
Subject: (nwl) Re: [JDBC] JDBC gripe list
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
>> Just got back from pgeast. Seems everyone seems to have a gripe about
>> the JDBC driver.
>>
>> My sense is that for basic read/write/update/delete the driver works
>> just fine. However I'd like to compile a list of everyone's gripe.
>
> Funny that, I just got back from a different conference where people
> were griping about it also.
>
> Didn't get a detailed list but numbers of less impressed people all
> active Postgres users and supporters.
>
> JDBC4 was mentioned.
So thinking about this. JDBC4 does nothing to really add to the 4
basic operations. What I am thinking is that many other tools require
JDBC4 and as a result ours doesn't work well ?
>
> Will look to collect more info.
Thanks!
Dave
http://www.credativ.ca
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc