Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f) | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8875.1485813356@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commitid: 69f4b9c85f) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commitid: 69f4b9c85f)
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-01-27 17:58:04 +0530, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
>> SELECT  *
>> FROM pg_constraint pc,
>> CAST(CASE WHEN pc.contype IN ('f','u','p') THEN generate_series(1,
>> array_upper(pc.conkey, 1)) ELSE NULL END AS int) AS position;
>> 
>> Above query is failing with "set-valued function called in context that
>> cannot accept a set".
> I think that's correct. Functions in FROM are essentially a shorthand
> for ROWS FROM(). And ROWS FROM doesn't allow arbitrary expressions.
No, but it allows whatever looks syntactically like a function, including
casts.  IIRC, we made func_expr work that way ages ago to deflect
complaints that it wasn't very clear why some things-that-look-like-
functions were allowed in CREATE INDEX and others not.
> If, I didn't check, that worked previously, I think that was more
> accident than intent.
Yeah, probably.  But are we prepared to break working queries?
As I understood it, the agreement on this whole tlist-SRF change
was that we would not change any behavior that wasn't ill-defined.
We could probably fix this with the modification that was discussed
previously, to allow FunctionScan nodes to project a scalar tlist
from the outputs of their SRFs.
        regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: