Re: pgbench duration option

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pgbench duration option
Дата
Msg-id 8861.1219105120@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgbench duration option  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: pgbench duration option  (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>> Last time I tried to quantify the overhead of logging with timestamps on 
>> I couldn't even measure its impact, it was lower than the usual pgbench  
>> noise.

> There's a hardware deficiency on certain machines -- I think it's old
> ones.  I don't know if machines that would currently be used in
> production would contain such a problem.

My understanding is that it's basically "cheap PC hardware" (with clock
interfaces based on old ISA bus specs) that has the issue in a
significant way.  I wouldn't expect you to see it on a serious database
server.  But lots of people still do development on cheap PC hardware,
which is why I think this is worth worrying about.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extending varlena
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures