Re: Assertion failure with a subtransaction and cursor

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Ok, committed that way. I made the cross-check a WARNING. That seems
> like the right level of seriousness, although I see that many of the
> other similar checks are Asserts.

Looks good.  I'm a bit tempted to rename the interXact argument to
something like noOwner --- no change in API, just name it a bit closer
to what it actually does now.  Thoughts?

            regards, tom lane