Re: FAQ (disk space)
| От | Greg Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: FAQ (disk space) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87zncau1qr.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: FAQ (disk space) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > This has been discussed, as Martijn says, and I believe the consensus > was that the benefits wouldn't exceed the costs. Note that a checksum > does not magically prevent errors, it just means that you will detect > errors and refuse to access potentially-corrupt data. Well there are ECC codes that allow correcting errors as well. But I don't see how that would help. You would have to check on every single memory access since it's likely memory that will cause single bit errors, not disk. Disk is more likely to give entire bad blocks. I think the moral is that if you are afraid of single bit errors corrupting data then you should probably spec out a server with ECC ram. -- greg
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: