Re: Hash Function: MD5 or other?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: Hash Function: MD5 or other?
Дата
Msg-id 87zmtt1lvo.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hash Function: MD5 or other?  (Shelby Cain <alyandon@yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: Hash Function: MD5 or other?  (Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>)
Re: Hash Function: MD5 or other?  (Shelby Cain <alyandon@yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Shelby Cain <alyandon@yahoo.com> writes:

> > My question is: is the builtin MD5 appropriate for this use or should I be
> > using a function from pl/something? Figures on collision rates would be
> > nice as well - the typical chunk of text is probably 1k-8k.

Note that MD5 is slow and CPU-intensive. By design.

If you want a quick way to find matching records then you might find something
like CRC to be more useful. With MD5 it's supposed to be hard for someone to
come up with inputs that hash to a target value, but if you're not too worried
about people trying to do that then MD5 is probably overkill.


--
greg

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: martin
Дата:
Сообщение: suse 9.2
Следующее
От: Howard Cole
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New to Postgre