>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Furthermore, I can't help noticing that the increased complexity>> has now pretty much negated your original
argumentsfor moving so>> much of the work out of nodeAgg.c.
Tom> The key reason for that was, and remains, not having theTom> behavior hard-wired in nodeAgg; I believe that this
designTom>permits things to be accomplished in aggregate implementationTom> functions that would not have been possible
withthe originalTom> patch. I'm willing to accept some code growth to have thatTom> flexibility.
Do you have an actual use case?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)