Re: [GENERAL] Up to date conventional wisdom re max shared_buffer size?
| От | Jerry Sievers |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Up to date conventional wisdom re max shared_buffer size? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87wp4tw8i6.fsf@jsievers.enova.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Up to date conventional wisdom re max shared_buffersize? (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes: > On 09/19/2017 05:00 PM, Jerry Sievers wrote: > [snip] > >> The DB is 10TB total size with OLTP plus some occasional heavy batching >> which frequently correlates with degradation that requires intervention. >> >> Unrelated server problem forced us to relocate from a Debian/Wheezy 3.x >> kernel 1T 144 CPU to the even bigger box mentioned earlier. And we wen >> up a major kernel version also in the process. > > How did you backup/restore a 10TB db? We just relocated the SAN volume. Takes about 1 minute :-) > > -- > World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification -- Jerry Sievers Postgres DBA/Development Consulting e: postgres.consulting@comcast.net p: 312.241.7800 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: