Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87twygdqu9.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric (was: Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)) (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tomas" == Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Right...so don't test a datum sort case, since that isn't supported>> at all in the master branch. Your test case is invalidfor that>> reason. Tomas> What do you mean by 'Datum sort case'? A case where the code path goes via tuplesort_begin_datum rather than tuplesort_begin_heap. Tomas> The test I was using is this: Tomas> select percentile_disc(0) within group (order by randnum) from stuff; Sorting single columns in aggregate calls uses the Datum sort path (in fact I think it's currently the only place that does). Do that test with _both_ the Datum and Numeric sort patches in place, and you will see the effect. With only the Numeric patch, the numeric abbrev code is not called. If you want a test that works without the Datum patch, try: select count(*) from (select randnum from stuff order by randnum) s; -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: