Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> But relation "a" *does* exist at the start of client 2's operation.
> While I'm not here to defend the exact phrasing of this error message,
> it does seem to me that it's appropriate to give a different error
> message than what appears when the table wasn't found at all.

Ok, fair enough -- I agree that we should treat the two cases
differently. But one thing I think we should do in any case is improve
the wording of the error message.

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC