Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option
| От | Gregory Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87slcrp0m6.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: >>> On 2/27/07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I see no reason to implement it if there is no performance gain. > However, I strongly concur that we need at least some evidence. It could > easily be that a misstep in the code, causes a loop over the wrong set > and all the performance we thought we would get is invalid, not because > of theory or what should happen, but because of actual implementation. It rather sounds like you're asking for a proof that Simon can write bug-free code before you allow him to write any code. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: