Re: Concurrent psql patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gregory Stark
Тема Re: Concurrent psql patch
Дата
Msg-id 87sla07sgu.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Concurrent psql patch  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
Ответы Re: Concurrent psql patch  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Concurrent psql patch  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Список pgsql-patches
"Jim Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:

> I don't see how we could make the names shorter without moving away from a
> backslash command (which I'm guessing would be painful).
>
> Assuming we're stuck with a backslash command \cs[witch] and \cn
> [owait] seem to be about as good as we could get.

I don't have \cs or \cn set up as abbreviations.

I was originally thinking \c1, \c2, ... for \cswitch and \c& for \cnowait. I'm
not sure if going for cryptic short commands is better or worse here.

--
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ECPG patch to use prepare for improved performance
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Doc update for back-branches, CLUSTER and MVCC-safety