"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I know I just love it when a customer breaks something and I ask what
> changed and it is 56 different things ;)
>
> My question is.. with a checkpoint every 2 months, would it make it
> very easy to release every 6 (or 4 or 3 or 9) months? I am not saying
> we "have" to but it certainly opens up the possibility to the argument
> I made.
We could release "alpha" releases. But that assumes that these reviews
actually result in stuff getting committed even if they're not 100% complete.
I think that would be a good thing but I don't think everyone else agrees.
Also, not all reviewers are committers.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com