Re: interval * numeric operator

"Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> There are interval * double precision operators (both ways) but none for
>> interval * numeric.  Adding this would make sense since interval is now
>> optionally stored as fixed-point internally.  Any objections to adding this
>> in 8.4?
>
> +1
>
> I've been casting to Numeric anyway.

Shouldn't the cast be implicit anyways? What does having double precision
operators buy us? Wouldn't it introduce ambiguities?


--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!