Re: Commitfest infrastructure
| От | Gregory Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Commitfest infrastructure |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87pri6qsix.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release=?iso-8859-1?q?=09planning?=) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I thought reviewboard looked pretty good for code quality patch review. It would be cool if someone could write a mail filter which automatically added any patches posted to the list to reviewboard. Incidentally one issue with reviewboard/patchwork/whatever is that they tend to encourage the review to do a line-by-line review of the code itself rather than the overall architecture. That's fine for the kind of code-quality reviews some authors (like myself I admit :( ) need sometimes. And it would make it easier to do hit-and-run comments when you see minor issues not worth pestering authors about on-list. But I don't think it really helps with the hard reviews. But that's just a cute tool for one particular part of the work. I don't think it addresses workflow management like RT or debbugs (or trac?) would. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: