Re: Bug fix for glibc broke freebsd build in REL_11_STABLE
От | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug fix for glibc broke freebsd build in REL_11_STABLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87o9dbu5ti.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug fix for glibc broke freebsd build in REL_11_STABLE (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug fix for glibc broke freebsd build in REL_11_STABLE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 05/09/2018 18:42, Andres Freund wrote: >> Realistically we're going to be running into old versions of clang >> for a long time. And the importance of running i386 without SSE2 >> surely isn't increasing. So I don't really see an urgent need to do >> anything about it. And if it gets fixed, and we care, we can just >> add a clang version check to the test. Peter> Another option perhaps is to let this be and accept it as Peter> alternative floating point behavior. We already have some of Peter> those. If it was only a matter of error handling, then the best fix would likely to be just avoiding __builtin_isinf if (clang AND i386 AND not sse2). The problem is that if we're relying on -fexcess-precision=standard semantics in places besides infinity checks, then we won't get those semantics on clang/i386/no-sse2 since it has no comparable option. (What are we doing about compilers for x86-32 other than clang and gcc?) -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: