Re: streaming result sets: progress

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nic Ferrier
Тема Re: streaming result sets: progress
Дата
Msg-id 87n0o49f6w.fsf@pooh-sticks-bridge.tapsellferrier.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: streaming result sets: progress  (Haris Peco <snpe@snpe.co.yu>)
Ответы Re: streaming result sets: progress
Список pgsql-jdbc
Haris Peco <snpe@snpe.co.yu> writes:

> Yes, proccess increase with result from server and diferent is that
> C request less memory - in C we can execute big qyery than Java
> I can't believe that we must complete query in memory, but it is true
> Excuse me

If you look at the implementation of the libpq library you'll see
that it's exactly the same as the java one: the query is done and
then all the rows are retrieved and kept in memory.

If you're able to do it in C it's because C has slightly more
efficient memory handling than Java does. It must also mean that your
machine has just too little memory for your Java app, if I were you
I'd just buy some more RAM as a quick fix to your problem.

Another alternative is to create 2 connections and use a cursor in
one. Or to package your update operations as stored procs operating
over the large results.



Nic

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Barry Lind
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: forName finds Driver but getConnection doesn't
Следующее
От: Haris Peco
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: streaming result sets: progress