Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
| От | Gregory Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87mypuvpuh.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore? (Chris <dmagick@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
"Chris" <dmagick@gmail.com> writes: >> When I said "obfuscating" I meant it. I'm pretty familiar with sh scripting >> and I'm not even sure what the && behaviour would do. > > It chains commands together so if the first fails the second doesn't happen. I meant in this case, not in general. That is, does it introduce a subshell? Sh traditionally has to introduce to implement some of the logical control and pipe operators. I'm not sure if a simple && is enough but often it's surprising how quickly that happens. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: