Re: text and bytea
| От | Gregory Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: text and bytea |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87mypp3wet.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: text and bytea ("hernan gonzalez" <hgonzalez@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: text and bytea
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
"hernan gonzalez" <hgonzalez@gmail.com> writes:
> IMHO, the semantics of encode() and decode() are correct (the bridge
> between bytea and text ... in the backend encoding; they should be the
> only bridge), convert() is also ok (deals with bytes), but
> convert_to() and convert_from() are dubious if not broken: they imply
> texts in arbitrary encodings (for output or input) , lead to
> anomalities and shouldnt be necessary at all.
postgres=# \df convert_from
List of functions
Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
------------+--------------+------------------+---------------------
pg_catalog | convert_from | text | bytea, name
(1 row)
postgres=# \df convert_to
List of functions
Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
------------+------------+------------------+---------------------
pg_catalog | convert_to | bytea | text, name
(1 row)
Looks like they produce and consume byteas to me.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: