Re: Viewing non-system objects in psql
| От | Greg Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Viewing non-system objects in psql |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87ll5a8091.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Viewing non-system objects in psql ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Viewing non-system objects in psql
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> writes:
> I maintain that it makes more sense for those few people who regularly look
> at system functions to add a "S" than to have everyone else have to do
> things such as "\df public."
@@aol(me too).
fwiw, i think "few" may be a bit optimistic here. Don't forget you can do
things like this if you forget what arguments array_lower takes:
db=> \df array_lower
List of functions
Result data type | Schema | Name | Argument data types
------------------+------------+-------------+---------------------
integer | pg_catalog | array_lower | anyarray, integer
(1 row)
Or this to get a list of all the standard array functions.
db=> \df array_*
P.S. The use of capital "s" is possible a source of some of the resistance. It
seems like a lowercase "s" or something else that doesn't need multiple
keystrokes would be a lot easier to type. Is there some limitation on the
\command parser that makes \dfs harder?
--
greg
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: