Re: Performance Problem
От
Gregory Stark
Тема
Re: Performance Problem
Дата
Msg-id
87lkeycyry.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Ответ на
Performance Problem (Gauri Kanekar)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Performance Problem "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
"Gauri Kanekar" writes: > Befor doing vaccum full on the database this query use to take less > than 4min. But now after doing vacumming reindexing the tables it is > taking 73mins. Vacuum full is generally not necessary. You do need to ensure regular vacuum is run frequently on heavily updated tables though. > After observing the explain analyse it seems like it is not selecting > the required index properly. > > So can anybody suggest any thing?? -> Bitmap Index Scan on campaign_attributes_pk (cost=0.00..105.83 rows=60 width=0) (actual time=1.721..1.721 rows=1279 loops=1) When's the last time you analyzed your tables? Postgres is guessing it'll find 60 rows and instead finding over a thousands rows... -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления