Re: [PATCH] OAuth: fix performance bug with stuck multiplexer events
От | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] OAuth: fix performance bug with stuck multiplexer events |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87ldnvgkdq.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PATCH] OAuth: fix performance bug with stuck multiplexer events (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] OAuth: fix performance bug with stuck multiplexer events
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> writes: > From 50257bf32eb2b0972e5139ac4a79367372c77385 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> > Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 15:04:34 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] oauth: Add unit tests for multiplexer handling I haven't read the meat of the patch, but I have some comments on the tests: > +IPC::Run::run ['oauth_tests'], > + '>', IPC::Run::new_chunker, sub { print {$out} $_[0] }, > + '2>', IPC::Run::new_chunker, sub { print {$err} $_[0] } > + or die "oauth_tests returned $?"; We've recently switched to using fat commas (=>) between options and their arguments, and that includes the file redirections in IPC::Run. Although not semantically meaningful, I'd also be tempted to put parens around the argument list for each redirect, so it's clear that they go together. Also, indirect object syntax (print {$fh} ...) is ugly and old-fashioned, it's nicer to call it as a method on the filehandle. So I'd write the above as: IPC::Run::run ['oauth_tests'], '>' => (IPC::Run::new_chunker, sub { $out->print($_[0]) }), '2>' => (IPC::Run::new_chunker, sub { $err->print($_[0]) }) or die "oauth_tests returned $?"; As for the C TAP tests, there's already a bunch of TAP-outputting infrastructure in pg_regress.c. Would it make sense to factor that out into a common library? - ilmari
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: