Re: "CREATE RULE ... ON SELECT": redundant?
| От | Andrew Gierth |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "CREATE RULE ... ON SELECT": redundant? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87jzxoboyf.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: "CREATE RULE ... ON SELECT": redundant? (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: "CREATE RULE ... ON SELECT": redundant?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: Andrew> I thought they used CREATE RULE on a table? Andrew> In fact here is an example from a pg 9.5 pg_dump output (with Andrew> cruft removed): And checking other versions, 9.6 is the same, it's only with pg 10 that it switches to creating a dummy view instead of a table (and using CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW, no mention of rules). So if the goal was to preserve compatibility with pre-pg10 dumps, that's already broken; if that's ok, then I don't see any obvious reason not to also remove or at least deprecate CREATE RULE ... ON SELECT for views. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: