Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> We are not in the business of getting spec-required semanticsTom> 80% right;

I guess that's why we still fold identifiers to lowercase, why our
timestamp implementation differs from the standard, why we used to
require AS for select-list aliases, why our views aren't updateable,
why we violate the spec for UNIQUE, why we don't have schema-unique
constraint names, why we don't implement MATCH PARTIAL, ...

The SQL spec is a Platonic ideal to which _none_ of the implementations
are more than a vague approximation.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)