Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP)
| От | Dimitri Fontaine |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87iq2x66ov.fsf@hi-media-techno.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP) (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> writes: > It depends on use cases, but in my mind plain text will do for us. If > we have JavaScript engine in PostgreSQL like pl/v8 and it handles > on-disk format as-is, then we should choose the kind of format, but in > either text or binary format way it is hopeless to have such > compelling environment in the short future. Well, for javascript support, there's another nice thing happening: - plscheme is built on GNU Guile - next version of GNU Guile supports javascript too http://plscheme.projects.postgresql.org/ http://wingolog.org/archives/2009/02/22/ecmascript-for-guile So my current guess at which javascript engine we'd get first would be plscheme. Now I don't know what implication that would have on the binary storage format of javascript or json documents. Regards, -- dim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: