Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Дата
Msg-id 87hdp7xfrn.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@oryx.com>)
Ответы Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@oryx.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@oryx.com> writes:

> --- fe-protocol3.c.1~    2004-10-05 18:59:55.293092244 +0530
> +++ fe-protocol3.c    2004-10-05 19:17:48.154807848 +0530
> @@ -220,6 +220,11 @@ pqParseInput3(PGconn *conn)
>                      conn->asyncStatus = PGASYNC_READY;
>                      break;
>                  case '1':        /* Parse Complete */
> +                    if (conn->result == NULL)
> +                        conn->result = PQmakeEmptyPGresult(conn,
> +                                                           PGRES_COMMAND_OK);
> +                    conn->asyncStatus = PGASYNC_READY;
> +                    break;
>                  case '2':        /* Bind Complete */
>                  case '3':        /* Close Complete */
>                      /* Nothing to do for these message types */

So why is this part of the patch ok? Isn't it going to make libpq get confused
every time a PQExecPrepared sends a v3.0 prepare message? It will mark the
connection as PGASYNC_READY as soon as the prepare response is parsed instead
of waiting for the responses from the bind and execute messages that have
already been sent.

This is more or less where I got stuck on my attempt at the same thing. It
seems like to handle "bundled" calls like PQExecPrepared libpq would have to
keep track of from what call various messages arose. That seems like it would
complicate things quite a bit.

-- 
greg



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gavin Sherry
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb crash
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Two-phase commit