Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Gierth
Тема Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Дата
Msg-id 87h8cqf37i.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

 Tom> Also, I thought of a somewhat-related scenario that the code isn't
 Tom> accounting for: you can break the restrictions about single
 Tom> evaluation with nested WITHs, like

I also thought about that. But what I thought about it on reflection
was: if the user explicitly wrote NOT MATERIALIZED, then we should
assume they mean it.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Bossart, Nathan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Следующее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: COPY FREEZE and setting PD_ALL_VISIBLE/visibility map bits