Re: code question: storing INTO relation
| От | Greg Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: code question: storing INTO relation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87fz46wcun.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: code question: storing INTO relation (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: code question: storing INTO relation
Re: code question: storing INTO relation |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I agree, hence why this should be a user option. The usage of this is > restricted to particular classes of database usage: data warehousing or > very large database applications. This isn't intended for use in OLTP or > web-site databases. Well a lot of users also just don't use online backups. For these users there's no downside to CREATE INDEX/REINDEX/CREATE TABLE AS not logging. The logging is not needed for a regular recovery, only for restoring from and a backup older than the table/index creation. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: