Re: WIP patch for "operator families"

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
> into "operator families", as per discussion last week.  It's far from
> ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments.  What's done
> is ...

> Comments?

Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress
would be more visible?

--
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com