Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> > > BTW, if you actually wanted to improve readability, defining a
> > > SECS_PER_YEAR value and replacing the various occurrences of
> > > "36525 * 864" with it would help.
> > > 
> > IIRC the number of seconds in a year is far from a constant.
> 
> Yes, I added a comment mentioning that we don't track leap seconds.
> And this doesn't handle crossing uneven daylight savings time intervals.

It doesn't even represent leap years, never mind leap seconds.

-- 
greg