On 9/29/17 19:38, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Reading over this code again, it is admittedly not quite clear why this
>> "canonicalization" is in there right now. I think it had something to
>> do with how we built the keyword variants at one point. It might not
>> make sense. I'd be glad to take that out and use the result straight
>> from uloc_getAvailable() for collcollate. That is, after all, the
>> "canonical" version that ICU chooses to report to us.
>
> Is anything going to happen here ahead of shipping v10? This remains
> an open item.
I'm still pondering committing my documentation patch I had posted, and
I've been reviewing your patches to see if there is anything else
documentation-wise that could be added.
As I had mentioned before, I disagree with the substance of the
functionality changes you are proposing, and I think it would be way too
late to make such significant changes. The general community opinion
also seems to be in favor of letting things be.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers