Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>>> looks like it really has to be defined with "char" in double quotes. I
>>> thought just char is enough...
>
>> They're different types.
>
> You know, maybe we should stop holding our noses and do something about
> this old gotcha. That type's not going away anytime soon, but could we
> rename it to char1 or something like that?
int1?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!