Re: Another swing at JSON

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: Another swing at JSON
Дата
Msg-id 87d3l9109w.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Another swing at JSON  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Another swing at JSON  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Another swing at JSON  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Another swing at JSON  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Why are you worrying with the non-PGXS build chain anyway?  Just assume
> that the module is going to be built with PGXS and things should just
> work.
>
> We've gone over this a dozen times in the past.

+1

I'm not sure why we still support the pre-PGXS build recipe in the
contrib Makefiles, and didn't want to change that as part as the
extension patch series, but I think we should reconsider.

This and removing module_pathname in the control files to just use
$libdir/contrib in the .sql files.  That would set a better example to
people who want to make their own extensions, as the general case is
that those will not get into contrib.

I think we should lower the differences between contrib and external
extensions, so that contrib is only about who maintains the code and
distribute the extension.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Problem with streaming replication, backups, and recovery (9.0.x)
Следующее
От: Nicolas Barbier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL sourcecode