Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> E'' is more a marker than a type. I realize making E a type might work,
> but it seems unusual.
>
> What we could do is backpatch E'' to 8.0.X as a no-op like it will be in
> 8.1.
What happens if someone already has a type called "e" ?
--
greg